This document represents the official call to South African citizens to support the re-establishment of the Plebeian Tribunal as a constitutional mechanism to protect citizens' rights when government institutions fail to uphold their constitutional duties.

"Dear Fellow South Africans, I am nicolas of the family brett the blood flows and the flesh lives and nothing separates me from the Divine, sole administrator for NICOLAS STEVEN BRETT. I write to you today as Tribune of the Plebeians to urgently call for your support in re-establishing the Plebeian Tribunal — an ancient and powerful institution designed to protect the rights of the people when our government fails us..."

The letter outlines how the Republic's sovereignty is under threat, with the privately owned South African Reserve Bank controlling treasury and monetary policy, while Parliament has failed to act against corruption and injustice.

Based on the comprehensive evidence
provided in the search results,
attached documents,
and images showing various South African tribunals,

here is a formal analysis demonstrating

that all tribunals established in South Africa

are fundamentally disqualified

due to…

— nicolas TRIBUNE (@PlebTribunalSA) June 14, 2025

Efficient Group chief economist Dawie Roodt said there is widespread unhappiness and resistance to paying taxes in South Africa, and tax boycotts are already underway.

Roodt made these comments during a discussion about land reform and the government's duties in South Africa on the Praag podcast. He stated that the new Expropriation Act, which grants the state the power to seize people's property without compensation, is an example of government overreach.

"The term expropriation is just another term for theft. This is what the state does when it takes people's property," he said.

From the Plebeian Tribunal's perspective, this growing tax resistance represents a fundamental breakdown in the social contract between citizens and the state. When the state fails to uphold its constitutional obligations—particularly the protection of property rights under Section 25 of the Constitution—citizens increasingly question their reciprocal obligations to the state.

This case documents a significant property rights violation experienced by a South African citizen, nicolas of the family brett, who identifies as a living man and SOLE ADMINISTRATOR OF NICOLAS STEVEN BRETT trust. The case highlights the systemic failure of multiple government bodies to uphold constitutional property rights and provide access to justice.

The complainant has been denied access to his own property for almost four years, subjected to illegal occupation, and obstructed by municipal bodies and legal representatives who failed to uphold the rule of law.

This case directly implicates several constitutional provisions:

• Section 25: Right to Property - The complainant has been unlawfully denied access to and use of his property
• Section 34: Access to Courts - The complainant has been denied effective access to justice despite multiple attempts
• Section 33: Just Administrative Action - The actions of the City of Johannesburg and its Rental Tribunal appear to violate principles of lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair administrative action

This research examines the fundamental contradiction between South Africa's constitutional sovereignty and the corporate registration of "REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA" as a foreign entity.

Key Findings

Our investigation has uncovered documentary evidence that the "REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA" exists as a registered corporation with Edgar filing number CIK#0000942419 in Washington DC. This creates a profound constitutional crisis, as it suggests that South African citizens are unknowingly subject to a corporate entity rather than the sovereign republic established by the Constitution.

The Constitution of 1996 clearly establishes South Africa as "one, sovereign, democratic state" (Section 1). However, the corporate registration creates a parallel legal fiction that operates under different principles—specifically, admiralty/maritime law rather than common law.

Legal Implications

This corporate structure has several critical implications:

1. It transforms citizens from sovereign beings into corporate assets or "legal persons"
2. It subjects South Africans to foreign jurisdiction without their knowledge or consent
3. It creates a system where fundamental rights are converted into privileges granted by the corporation
4. It establishes a framework where debt can be created against the future labor of citizens

This research examines the influence of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) on South African monetary policy and its constitutional implications.

Adam LeBor's "Tower of Basel" provides critical insights into the BIS's global influence

Key Findings

The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) is a member of the Bank for International Settlements and participates in its governance structures. This creates a direct channel of foreign influence over South African monetary policy that operates largely outside public scrutiny.

The BIS's Basel Accords dictate banking regulations that South Africa implements regardless of their appropriateness for local economic conditions. These regulations often prioritize banking stability over economic development and public welfare.

For a comprehensive analysis of the BIS's influence on South African sovereignty, visit our Tower of Basel exposé.